Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Ann Hepatol ; 28(4): 101098, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298249

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lately, there has been a steady increase in early liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis (AAH). Although several studies have reported favorable outcomes with cadaveric early liver transplantation, the experiences with early living donor liver transplantation (eLDLT) are limited. The primary objective was to assess one-year survival in patients with AAH who underwent eLDLT. The secondary objectives were to describe the donor characteristics, assess the complications following eLDLT, and the rate of alcohol relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study was conducted at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India, between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent eLDLT. The mean time from abstinence to eLDLT was 92.4 ± 42.94 days. The mean model for end-stage liver disease and discriminant function score at eLDLT were 28.16 ± 2.89 and 104 ± 34.56, respectively. The mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.85 ± 0.12. Survival was 72% (95%CI, 50.61-88) after a median follow-up of 551 (23-932) days post-LT. Of the 18 women donors,11 were the wives of the recipient. Six of the nine infected recipients died: three of fungal sepsis, two of bacterial sepsis, and one of COVID-19. One patient developed hepatic artery thrombosis and died of early graft dysfunction. Twenty percent had alcohol relapse. CONCLUSIONS: eLDLT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with AAH, with a survival of 72% in our experience. Infections early on post-LT accounted for mortality, and thus a high index of suspicion of infections and vigorous surveillance, in a condition prone to infections, are needed to improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , End Stage Liver Disease , Hepatitis, Alcoholic , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Female , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/diagnosis , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/surgery , Ethanol , Graft Survival
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 117(4): 607-616, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242365

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic norfloxacin in preventing bacterial infections and its effect on transplant-free survival (TFS) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) identified by the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. METHODS: Patients with ACLF included in the study were randomly assigned to receive oral norfloxacin 400 mg or matched placebo once daily for 30 days. The incidence of bacterial infections at days 30 and 90 was the primary outcome, whereas TFS at days 30 and 90 was the secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included (72 in the norfloxacin and 71 in the placebo groups). Baseline demographics, biochemical variables, and severity scores were similar between the 2 groups. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the incidence of bacterial infections at day 30 was 18.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-28.9) and 33.8% (95% CI, 23-46) (P = 0.03); and the incidence of bacterial infections at day 90 was 46% (95% CI, 34-58) and 62% (95% CI, 49.67-73.23) in the norfloxacin and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.02). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, TFS at day 30 was 77.8% (95% CI, 66.43-86.73) and 64.8% (95% CI, 52.54-75.75) in the norfloxacin and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.084). Similarly, TFS at day 90 was 58.3% (95% CI, 46.11-69.84) and 43.7% (95% CI, 31.91-55.95), respectively (P = 0.058). Thirty percent of infections were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. More patients developed concomitant candiduria in the norfloxacin group (25%) than in the placebo group (2.63%). DISCUSSION: Primary norfloxacin prophylaxis effectively prevents bacterial infections in patients with ACLF.


Subject(s)
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure , Bacterial Infections , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/complications , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Norfloxacin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
3.
Hepatol Commun ; 6(11): 3275-3276, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2085038
4.
Vaccine ; 40(48): 6971-6978, 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2082750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies have reported poor humoral immune response to mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). However, the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 (vector-based) and BBV152 (inactivated virus) vaccines in patients with CLD and liver transplant recipients (LTRs) is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 and BBV152 vaccines in patients with CLD (including cirrhosis patients) and LTRs. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, consecutive completely vaccinated (ChAdOx1 or BBV152) non-cirrhosis CLD patients, those with cirrhosis, and LTRs were compared with matched healthy controls for anti-spike antibody and cellular response. RESULTS: Sixty healthy individuals, 50 NCCLD patients, 63 compensated and 50 decompensated cirrhosis, and 17 LTRs were included. The proportion of non-responders was similar among the healthy control (8 %), non-cirrhosis CLD (16 %), and compensated cirrhosis groups (17.5 %;p = 0.3). However, a higher proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis (34 %) and LTRs (59 %) were non-responders than the healthy controls (p = 0.001). Cluster of differentiation (CD) 4-effector cells were lower in patients with non-cirrhosis CLD and compensated cirrhosis. CD4-naïve, CD4-effector, B, and B-memory cells were lower in the decompensated cirrhosis group. Although the central memory cells were higher in the decompensated cirrhosis group, they could not differentiate into effector cells. CD4- and CD8-naïve cells were higher in the marrow in the LTRs, while the CD4-effector memory cells and CD4- and CD8-effector cells were lower in the LTRs. Furthermore, B cells were more deficient in the LTRs, suggesting poor antibody response. CONCLUSION: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and LTRs demonstrated suboptimal humoral and cellular immune responses against recombinant and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Liver Diseases , Liver Transplantation , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Prospective Studies , Liver Cirrhosis , Immunity , Transplant Recipients
6.
Gut ; 71(Suppl 2):A91-A92, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2020126

ABSTRACT

IDDF2022-ABS-0185 Table 1Clinical characteristics of patients with Giloy-induced liver injuryCharacteristics Number of patients (Total-16 patients) Gender Male 7 (43.75%) Female 9 (56.25%) Age (mean ± SD) 48.3±14 years Presentation type Acute hepatitis 6 (37.5%) ACLF 10 (62.5%) Mean duration for symptom onset after consumption of giloy 84.3±35 days Mean BMI 23.23±3 kg/m2 Comorbidities Type 2 diabetes 9 (56.25%) Interstitial lung disease (on inhalational steroids) 2 (12.5%) Hypertension 1 (6.25%) None 5 (31.25%) NAFLD 2 (6.25%) Symptoms Jaundice 16 (100%) Ascites 8 (50%) Fatigue 12 (75%) Pruritus 4 (25%) Liver function tests Peak total bilirubin (Mean ± SD) 17 ± 9.4 mg/dl Peak ALT (mean ± SD) 365± 219 U/L Peak AST (mean ± SD) 558 ± 475 U/L Peak ALP (mean ± SD) 186 ± 114 U/L Peak serum IgG (mean ± SD) 2400 ± 1213 mg/dl Peak INR (mean ± SD) 2.63 ± 1.05 AIH serology ANA 1(6.25%) ASMA - Anti LKM1 - AMA - Seronegative (biopsy proven) - Liver biopsy 10 (62.5) Drug induced liver injury 5 (31.25%) Features of AIH 5 (31.25%) Treatment N-Acetyl Cysteine infusion+Ademetionine 3 (18.75%) Steroids 10 (62.5%) Plasma Exchange 3 (18.75%) Outcome Alive 16 (100%) One listed for liver transplant Mean duration for recovery 37 ± 16 days IDDF2022-ABS-0185 Figure 1ConclusionsGiloy, a commonly used immunity booster, can produce drug-induced liver injury, which often mimics autoimmune hepatitis and responds to steroids.

8.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 12(6): 1580-1590, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1885890

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cholangiopathy is a recently known entity. There are very few reports of liver transplantation (LT) for COVID-19-induced cholangiopathy. It is well known that vaccines can prevent severe disease and improve outcomes. However, there are no reports on the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on cholestasis. Therefore, we aimed to compare the course and outcome of patients who developed cholestasis following COVID-19 infection among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Methods: Patients diagnosed with post-COVID cholestasis during the pandemic were included in the study after excluding other causes of cholestasis. Results: Eight unvaccinated and seven vaccinated individuals developed cholestasis following COVID-19 infection. Baseline demographics, presentation, severity, and management of COVID-19 were similar in both groups. However, patients in the unvaccinated group had a protracted course. The peak ALP was 312 (239-517) U/L in the vaccinated group and 571.5 (368-1058) U/L in the unvaccinated group (P = 0.02). Similarly, the peak γ-glutamyl transpeptidase values were lower in the vaccinated (325 [237-600] U/L) than in the unvaccinated group (832 [491-1640] U/L; P = 0.004). However, the peak values of total bilirubin, transaminases, and INR were similar in both groups. Five patients developed ascites gradually in the unvaccinated group whereas none in the vaccinated group developed ascites. Plasma exchange was done in five patients, and two were successfully bridged to living donor LT in the unvaccinated group. Only two patients recovered with conservative management in the unvaccinated group, whereas all recovered with conservative management in the vaccinated group. The other four patients in the unvaccinated group were planned for LT. Conclusion: Post-COVID-19 cholestasis is associated with high morbidity and mortality, meriting early identification and appropriate management. Vaccination can modify the course of severe COVID-19 infection and improve outcomes.

9.
Semin Liver Dis ; 42(3): 293-312, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1878572

ABSTRACT

Strategies to prevent infection and improve outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. HAV, hepatitis A virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; COVID-19, novel coronavirus disease 2019; NSBB, nonselective ß-blocker; PPI, proton pump inhibitors.Cirrhosis is a risk factor for infections. Majority of hospital admissions in patients with cirrhosis are due to infections. Sepsis is an immunological response to an infectious process that leads to end-organ dysfunction and death. Preventing infections may avoid the downstream complications, and early diagnosis of infections may improve the outcomes. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and biomarkers of infection; the incremental preventive strategies for infections and sepsi; and the consequent organ failures in cirrhosis. Strategies for primary prevention include reducing gut translocation by selective intestinal decontamination, avoiding unnecessary proton pump inhibitors' use, appropriate use of ß-blockers, and vaccinations for viral diseases including novel coronavirus disease 2019. Secondary prevention includes early diagnosis and a timely and judicious use of antibiotics to prevent organ dysfunction. Organ failure support constitutes tertiary intervention in cirrhosis. In conclusion, infections in cirrhosis are potentially preventable with appropriate care strategies to then enable improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , COVID-19 Testing , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/chemically induced , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Multiple Organ Failure
10.
Case Reports Hepatol ; 2022: 5413315, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874898

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted transplantation worldwide in a major way with infections and post-COVID-19 complications contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. We present a case of a 42-year-old lady who developed rhino-orbital mucormycosis in a postliver transplantation period. The initial presentation of the patient was very subtle. She never had overt COVID-19 infection before surgery and in the recovery period. Though cases of mucormycosis in the wound site have been reported, this would be one of the rare cases of rhino-orbital mucormycosis postliver transplantation. This infection leads to a rapid downhill course and the death of the patient. Atypical infections and presentations need to be monitored in postliver transplantation patients who are getting operated on during this pandemic, and a high level of clinical suspicion is required to pick up these cases at an early stage.

11.
Hepatol Commun ; 6(6): 1289-1300, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1626253

ABSTRACT

Tinospora cordifolia (Giloy) is an herbal supplement commonly used in the Indian alternative medicine system Ayurveda. This herb has been promoted to the public in India as an immune booster to prevent novel coronavirus disease 2019. However, small reports have recently shown an association between Giloy use and the development of herb-induced liver injury (HILI) with autoimmune features in some patients. This large retrospective Indian multicenter study spanning 13 centers at nine locations was designed to identify features and outcomes of HILI temporally associated with Giloy use. Chemical and toxicological analyses of retrieved Giloy samples using state-of-the-art methods were also performed. We report 43 patients, of whom more than half were female, with a median time from initial Giloy consumption to symptom onset of 46 days. Patients presented with acute hepatitis, acute worsening of chronic liver disease (CLD, the most common clinical presentation), or acute liver failure. Causality assessment revealed probable liver injury in 67.4%. The most common autoantibody detected was anti-nuclear antibody. Liver biopsy in a subset revealed HILI associated with autoimmune features and hepatocyte and canalicular cholestasis and neutrophilic and eosinophilic infiltration. Conclusion: Giloy is associated with acute hepatitis with autoimmune features and can unmask autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in people with silent AIH-related CLD. Further studies on the safety (and efficacy) of untested but heavily promoted herbals in alternative systems of medicine are an unmet need in the interests of public health and are especially important during this global health emergency.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Chronic , Hepatitis , Tinospora , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
12.
13.
EClinicalMedicine ; 38: 101025, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1397307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression and comorbidities increase the risk of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant (LT) recipients remain unclear. We aimed to analyse the outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in LT recipients. METHODS: The electronic databases were searched for articles published from 1 December 2019 to 20 May 2021 with MeSH terms COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and liver transplantation. Studies reporting outcomes in more than 10 LT recipients were included for analysis. LT vs non-LT patients with COVID-19 infection were compared for all-cause mortality, which was the primary outcome studied. We also evaluated the relation between the timing of COVID-19 infection post-LT (< one year vs > one year) and mortality. FINDINGS: Eighteen articles reporting 1,522 COVID-19 infected LT recipients were included for the systematic review. The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 60·38 (5·24) years, and 68·5% were men. The mean time (SD) to COVID-19 infection was 5·72 (1·75) years. Based on 17 studies (I2 = 7·34) among 1,481 LT recipients, the cumulative incidence of mortality was 17·4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15·4-19·6). Mortality was comparable between LT (n = 610) and non-LT (n = 239,704) patients, based on four studies (odds ratio [OR], 0·8 [0·6-1·08]; P = 0·14). Additionally, there was no significant difference in mortality between those infected within one year vs after one year of LT (OR, 1·5 [0·63-3·56]; P = 0·35). The cumulative incidence of graft dysfunction was 2·3% (1·3-4·1). Nearly 23% (20·71-25) of the LT patients developed severe COVID-19 infection. Before infection, 71% and 49% of patients were on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, respectively. Immunosuppression was modified in 55·9% (38·1-72·2) patients after COVID-19 infection. INTERPRETATION: LT and non-LT patients with COVID-19 have a similar risk of adverse outcomes.

14.
Med J Armed Forces India ; 77: S271-S277, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1333668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV- 19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Covishield) was administered to the eligible beneficiaries of tertiary care institute of Western Maharashtra on 16 Jan 21 and in the past three months almost 97% of the staff has been vaccinated. The present study analyses the incidence of COVID cases in the unvaccinated and vaccinated population of the institute. METHODS: All Covid 19 infections (RT-PCR positive) from 01 February 21 to 25 April 21 were included in the study and analyzed as per their vaccination status. To assess the COVID 19 transmission in contacts, Secondary Attack Rates (SAR) of the pre-vaccination period (Jun-Oct 20) was compared with the present SAR. RESULTS: A total of 113 cases occurred in the study period (01 Feb to 25 Apr 21). Lower number of infections were observed among the fully vaccinated as compared to partially vaccinated and non-vaccinated. The overall vaccine effectiveness was found to be 88.6% (81.55-92.37) and 44.1% (4.55-67.3) in completely and partially vaccinated individuals respectively. Hazard Ratios for getting infected dropped significantly after 28 days of the second dose. The SAR in high risk contacts (HRCs) was found to be 4.25%, which was lower than SAR (20.6%) of pre-vaccination period. CONCLUSION: This is one of the earliest studies in India to report the impact of COVID-19 vaccination. The results indicate that the vaccine provides effective protection against COVID-19 infection. However, given the complex dynamics of vaccination, the role of NPIs and implementation of COVID appropriate behavior cannot be undermined.

16.
J Clin Transl Hepatol ; 9(2): 276-278, 2021 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1232705
18.
Am J Transplant ; 21(6): 2279-2284, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1052266

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) has impacted solid organ transplantation (SOT) in many ways. Transplant centers have initiated SOT despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it is suggested to wait for 4 weeks after COVID-19 infection, there are no data to support or refute the timing of liver transplant after COVID-19 infection. Here we describe the course and outcomes of COVID-19-infected candidates and healthy living liver donors who underwent transplantation. A total of 38 candidates and 33 potential living donors were evaluated from May 20, 2020 until October 30, 2020. Ten candidates and five donors were reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pretransplant. Four candidates succumbed preoperatively. Given the worsening of liver disease, four candidates underwent liver transplant after 2 weeks due to the worsening of liver disease and the other two candidates after 4 weeks. Only one recipient died due to sepsis posttransplant. Three donors underwent successful liver donation surgery after 4 weeks of COVID-19 infection without any postoperative complications, and the other two were delisted (as the candidates expired). This report is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of elective liver transplant early after COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients
19.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 11(2): 273-275, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-844698
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL